A STUDY ON THE PHYSICAL DEATH OF JESUS CHRIST
From the Departments of Pathology (Dr.
William Edwards, Clinical Pathologist ) and Medical Graphics (Mr. Floyd Hosmer, American Medical Illustrators
Association), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; and the Homestead
United Methodist Church, Rochester, Minn, and the West Bethel United Methodist Church, Bethel, Minn (Pastor
Wesley Gabel, Masters Degree in Divinity). Reprinted from the JAMA© Journal of the American Medical
AssociationMarch 21, 1986, Volume 225 Copyright 1986.The following is their
discussion on the physical effects of Crucifixion. How the body actually responds to the trauma of crucifixion from
a pathological point of view.
Introduction: THE LIFE and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth have formed the basis for a major world religion Christianity, have appreciably influenced the course of human history, and,
by virtue of a compassionate attitude toward the sick, also have contributed to the development of modern medicine.
The eminence of Jesus as a historical figure and the suffering and controversy associated with his death have stimulated us
to investigate, in an interdisciplinary manner, the circumstances surrounding his crucifixion. Accordingly, it
is our intent to present not a theological treatise but rather a medically and historically accurate account of the physical
death of the one called Jesus Christ. Jesus of Nazareth underwent Jewish and Roman trials were flogged and were sentenced
to death by crucifixion. The scourging produced deep stripe like lacerations and appreciable blood loss and it probably
set the stage for hypovolemic shock as evidenced by the fact that Jesus was too weakened to carry the crossbar (patibulum)
to Golgotha. At the site of crucifixion his wrists were nailed to the patibulum and after the patibulum was lifted onto
the upright post (stipes) his feet were nailed to the stipes. The major pathophysiologic effect of crucifixion was an
interference with normal respirations. Accordingly death resulted primarily from hypovolemic shock and exhaustion asphyxia.
Jesus death was ensured by the thrust of a soldiers spear into his side. Modern medical interpretation of the historical
evidence indicates that Jesus was dead when taken down from the cross.(JAMA 1986; 255:1455-1463)The source Material concerning Christ's death comprises a body of literature and
not a physical body or its skeletal remains. Accordingly, the credibility of any discussion of Jesus' death will
be determined primarily by the credibility of one's sources. For this review, the source material includes the writings
of ancient Christian and non-Christian authors, the writings of modern authors, and the Shroud of Turin. Using the legal-historical
method of scientific investigation, scholars have established the reliability and accuracy of the ancient manuscripts.The
most extensive and detailed descriptions of the life and death of Jesus are to be found in the New Testament Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.1 the other 23 books of the New Testament support but do not expand on the details
recorded in the Gospels. Contemporary Christian, Jewish, and Roman authors provide additional insight concerning the
first-century Jewish and Roman legal systems and the details of scourging and crucifixion. Seneca, Livy, Plutarch, and others refer to crucifixion practices in their works. Specifically, Jesus (or his crucifixion) is mentioned by
the Roman historians Cornelius Tacitus, Pliny the younger, and Suetonius, by non-roman historians Thallus and Phlegon, by the satirist Lucian of Samosata, by the Jewish Talmud, and by the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, although the authenticity of portions of the latter is problematic.
The Shroud of Turin is considered by many to represent the actual burial cloth of Jesus, and several publications concerning the medical aspects
of his death draw conclusions from this assumption. The Shroud of Turin and recent archaeological findings provide valuable
information concerning Roman crucifixion practices. The interpretations of modern writers, based on knowledge of science
and medicine not available in the first century, may offer additional insight concerning the possible mechanisms of Jesus'
death. When taken in concert certain facts -- the extensive and early testimony of both Christian proponents and opponents,
and their universal acceptance of Jesus as a true historical figure; the ethic of the gospel writers, and the shortness of
the time interval between the events and the extant manuscripts; and the confirmation of the Gospel accounts by historians
and archaeological findings ensure a reliable testimony from which a modern medical interpretation of Jesus' death may